Case suit for the freedom of speech in Europe

European-Court-of-Human-Rights-2048x1365

A case for the freedom of speech in Europe

 

There has been filed a case to The European Court of Human Rights, a case brought by the Danish NGO, the Freedom Movements Federation, against the Danish State. This is regarded as a very important case in censorship.

This case is similar to the one brought against the Biden administration by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri. They had sued the government for illegally suppressing free speech on social media.

The suit states that the Biden administration worked with social media companies to suppress the content of disfavored individuals. It also claims that President Joe Biden and other high-ranking government officials coordinated with the platforms to suppress free speech. They allegedly labeled the content of disfavored individuals as “disinformation,” and “misinformation”. The suit also focuses on the various issues that have been identified as possible threats to the election process, such as the emergence of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

In 2017, the Danish government was accused of suppressing free speech through the establishment of a news outlet called Monday Morning, which is a fact-checking organization. The organization, which is chaired by the dean of the faculty of journalism, is funded by grants by the goverment.

Our case was initially filed against the Prime Minister of Denmark and the two companies that operate social media platforms, Facebook and Tjekdet.dk. It demanded an injunction against the government’s efforts to suppress free speech. The court also issued a court order to the government to ensure that it does not violate the rights of free speech.

The court also ordered the government to stop funding organizations that are known to suppress free speech. These include Monday Morning and Tjekdet.dk.

The case presented numerous counts of censorship against highly qualified individuals, such as doctors and scientists. It also highlighted the various sources of information that the government uses to suppress free speech. These include the Danish Health Authority and the statistical department of the government. According to the plaintiffs, the government’s efforts to suppress free speech were motivated by the belief that the information was seen to coincide with the official narrative.

This allowed the case to be brought to the European Court of Human Rights or the European Union Court. The complaint was sent on July 20, which was the anniversary of the attempted assassination of Hitler. It was also the day that a coup d’etat against the Nazis took place in Denmark.

The fate of this suit will affect all countries within the European Council, 47 countries alltogether.

To ensure that the case receives proper attention, we are asking people to support the plaintiffs by making donations. The total cost of the lawsuit is estimated only  at around 18.000 euros.

 

 

The link to the fundraiser is here:

 

 

 

 

And the link to the complaint as launched (in English) You can read it here:

 

 

 

 

Del artiklen

dissensMEDIA i , , | Nøgleord ,

Artiklen er udtryk for skribentens egen holdning. Alle holdninger, som kan udtrykkes inden for straffelovens og presseetikkens rammer, er velkomne. Har du en interessant historie, du vil dele med os, så skriv til dissensMEDIA på dissensmedia@protonmail.com

Vi respekterer anonymitet

dissensMEDIA er medlem af

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-mailadresse vil ikke blive publiceret. Krævede felter er markeret med *

Flere eksempler på alvorlige bivirkninger fra de eksperimentelle behandlinger

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – systemkritikernes talerør Hvordan kan nogen påstå at de eksperimentelle behandlinger er sikre og anbefale og presse befolkningen til at tage dem?   Herunder eksempler på personer, der har fået alvorlige bivirkninger inkl. død. Intentionen er at give de personer …

Flere eksempler på alvorlige bivirkninger fra de eksperimentelle behandlinger Læs mere »

Er corona-vanviddet en forbrydelse?

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email dissensMEDIA – systemkritikernes talerør Er corona-vanviddet en forbrydelse? Se godt efter i denne video og mærk hvad det gør ved dig. Udgivet den 23.januar 2022 af dissensMEDIA   Hvorfor skal vi lokkes og tvinges til at få indsprøjtet en eksperimentel …

Er corona-vanviddet en forbrydelse? Læs mere »

Yderligere eksempler på skader fra de eksperimentelle behandlinger

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – systemkritikernes talerør Hvordan kan nogen påstå at de eksperimentelle behandlinger er sikre og anbefale og presse befolkningen til at tage dem? Herunder eksempler på personer, der har fået alvorlige bivirkninger inkl. død. Intentionen er at give de personer med …

Yderligere eksempler på skader fra de eksperimentelle behandlinger Læs mere »

Bekymrende farlige Covid-19-vaccine batches fundet i Danmark

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email dissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed Der foregår et skjult eksperiment i det eksisterende eksperiment med Covid-19 vaccinerne. Ny data fra Danmark beviser, at nogle covid-19 vaccine batches er flere tusinde gange mere skadelige end de øvrige, og de står for langt …

Bekymrende farlige Covid-19-vaccine batches fundet i Danmark Læs mere »

Toksiske Pfizer Covid-19 vaccinebatches

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed Toksiske Pfizer Covid-19 vaccinebatches Max Schmeling har udarbejdet en liste over vaccinebatches, som på nuværende tidspunkt dækker Danmark. Her kan du tjekke dit vaccinebatch fra listen og se om du skal være bekymret eller ej. Udgivet den …

Toksiske Pfizer Covid-19 vaccinebatches Læs mere »

More Harm Than Good

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed More Harm Than Good Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA), Canadian Covid Care Alliance, er en alliance af mere end 500 uafhængige canadiske læger, forskere og praktiserende læger, som har forpligtet sig til at levere kvalificeret, afbalanceret, evidensbaserede …

More Harm Than Good Læs mere »

Tolkningsbidrag til Corona-pas-tvangs-loven

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed Tolkningsbidrag til Corona-pas-tvangs-loven Juridisk Team i Frihedsbevægelsens Fællesråd har skrevet et tolkningsbidrag til loven om arbejdsgivers adgang til at pålægge lønmodtagere forevisning af coronapas, test for covid-19 m.v. – i det følgende kaldet Loven. Udgivet den 18. …

Tolkningsbidrag til Corona-pas-tvangs-loven Læs mere »

Djokovic går imod vaccinetyranniet – Er nu sendt hjem

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed Djokovic går imod vaccinetyranniet – Er nu sendt hjem Tennisstjernen Novak Djokovic har fra første færd, lige siden WHO for knapt to år siden bekendtgjorde, at der var tale om en pandemi, haft sine meningers mod og …

Djokovic går imod vaccinetyranniet – Er nu sendt hjem Læs mere »

Ikke-vaccinerede – De nye undermennesker

Share this post: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on EmaildissensMEDIA – respektfuld uenighed Ikke-vaccinerede – De nye undermennesker Denne artikel er et opråb til danskerne om den faretruende udvikling, der finder sted lige nu. Ikke-vaccinerede, der udpeges som den nye fjende af folket. Udgivet den 14.1.2022 Af Michelle S. Mikkelsen …

Ikke-vaccinerede – De nye undermennesker Læs mere »